Many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art雅思寫作7分范文

雅思寫作大作文題目

Many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art which helps to develop quality in people’s lives.However,governments should spend money on other things rather than art.Do you agree or disagree?

世界上的許多政府在藝術上投入大量資金以幫助提升人們的生活質量。然而，政府應該將錢用在其他方面而非藝術。你在多大程度上同意或者不同意這一觀點？

雅思寫作大作文范文

開頭段

Societies with a heritage in the‘arts’have long been considered culturally sophisticated and advanced.However,with the recent financial crisis this lavishness and expense should be questioned.Tax-payers’money has to be spent practically rather than on cultural endeavours.Firstly,not everyone in society appreciates art,and,secondly,employment should take precedence.

擁有藝術遺產的社會往往被認為在文化方面更為精致更為高級。然而，在當前金融危機的影響下，這一奢侈和花費應該受到質疑。納稅人的錢必須用在實用的地方，而非文化嘗試。首先，不是社會中的每個人都欣賞藝術，其次，就業應該優先。

藝術愛好者太少

Art can bring quality into one’s life if you are interested.In society art-lovers are typically in the minority,and other activities,such as sports are more popular.Take football,for example.Across the globe it is obvious that there are more people watching matches in stadiums than looking at sculptures or art.This fact makes it impossible that art can bring quality into a community if the galleries hold little interest for the region.

如果你對藝術感興趣的話，藝術能夠增強一個人的生活品質。在社會中，藝術愛好者通常只占少數，而其他活動，比如運動，更為流行。以足球為例，很明顯，世界范圍內有更多人在體育場館中觀看比賽，而非欣賞雕塑或藝術。既然普通民眾對藝術不感興趣，那么藝術能夠提升社區的生活品質就成了無稽之談。

錢應該用在能使大多數人受益的地方

Secondly,the resources diverted to such projects come from the public and should be spent in a way that benefits them.Commissioning or purchasing art is an insult to taxpayers who endure high unemployment,such as,those in Newcastle,UK.This city suffers from historically high unemployment,yet the council commissioned a large sculpture called‘The Angel of the North’.Financing a job creation project would undoubtedly have been more practical for the local community.

其次，用于這些項目的資源來自于公眾。它們應該是其受益。購買藝術品對忍受較高失業率的納稅人來說是種侮辱。例如，英國的紐卡斯爾正遭受前所未有的高失業率，然后當地政府卻委托創作一座被稱為“北部天使”的大型雕塑。將資金用于創造工作崗位無疑對當地社區更為實用。

結論

To conclude,I believe that it is an unjust affirmation that art brings quality into one’s life,and I agree that the money should be spent elsewhere.This is because art expenditures only benefit a small minority and secondly the expense involved should benefit the majority.Ideally in the future,governments will recognise that quality in a person’s life derives from a decent opportunity in life,not a sculpture.

總的來說，我認為藝術能夠提高生活品質的判斷是沒有依據的，錢應該用于別的地方。這是因為藝術花費只能使少部分人受益，而這筆錢應該讓大多數人過的更好。理想情況下，未來政府會意識到，一個人的生活品質來自于體面的生活，而非雕塑。

>> 雅思 托福 免費課程學習，AI量身規劃讓英語學習不再困難<<